We are going to desire our interest on matchmaking anywhere between relationship software have fun with and you can sociodemographic characteristics and you will character ratings

New analyses was in fact performed which have R cuatro.0.0 (R Foundation to have Mathematical Calculating, Vienna, Austria) . No lost research had been present in the databases. Brand new open databases and you will password data for those analyses arrive on Open Science Construction data source (

Desk step 1

Age, measured in years. Men: dummy variable where women = 0 and men = 1. Single: dummy variable where in a relationship = 0 and single = 1. Sexual minority: dummy variable where heterosexual = 0 and sexual minority = 1. ––– = Mean and standard deviation for apps use groups are not reported as this variable was nominal with three levels. Bold values correspond to statistically significant associations (p < 0.05).

Desk dos

Nonusers: people said having never ever used relationship applications. Earlier users: participants reported which have utilized relationships apps, however over the last 3 months. Latest users: Professionals said which have made use of matchmaking apps over the last 90 days. Age, counted in many years. Proportions because of the line.

Of the participants, 71.5% (n = 1219) were nonusers, 15.8% (n = 270) were earlier in the day dating apps users, and 12.7% (n = 216) were latest users. All sociodemographic variables were associated with the dating apps users groups. With respect to gender, for women, the distributions by group was p_nonuser = 0.75, p_previous = 0.15, and p_current = 0.10; for men, p_nonuser = 0.65, p_previous = 0.17, and p_current = 0.18; ? 2 (2) = , p < 0.001, V = 0.12. For those in a relationship, p_nonuser = 0.79, p_previous = 0.17, and p_current = 0.04; for single participants, p_nonuser = 0.65, p_previous = 0.15, and p_current = 0.20; ? 2 (2) = , p < 0.001, V = 0.24. For heterosexual participants, p_nonuser = 0.79, p_previous = 0.13, and p_current = 0.08; for sexual minority participants, gaydar p_nonuser = 0.55, p_previous = 0.23, and p_current = 0.23; ? 2 (2) = , p < 0.001, V = 0.25. Age was associated with the dating apps users groups, with previous users being the older ones (M = , SD = 2.16) and nonusers the youngers (M = , SD = 1.98), F(2, 1702) = , p < 0.001, R = 0.24.

Personality means differed by dating apps users group for all considered variables (all ps ? 0.017), except for Extraversion, F(2, 1702) = 0.00, p = 0.998. All effect sizes could be considered as rather small (M_R = 0.07, range [.00, 0.10]). The higher associations were with respect to Open-Mindedness (higher mean for current users) and Conscientiousness (higher mean for nonusers). We note that Conscientiousness and Dark Core showed a high negative correlation (r = –0.59, p < 0.001).

Results of the multinomial logistic regression models are shown in Table 3 . The explanatory capacity of the model was moderate (Nagelkerke’s pseudo-R 2 = 0.25, McFadden’s pseudo-R 2 = 0.14). The explanatory ability was basically provided by the sociodemographic information. Being a member of a sexual minority greatly increased the probability of dating apps use (OR_previous = 3.08, p < 0.001; OR_current = 4.11, p < 0.001). Men had a higher probability of use (OR_previous = 1.44, p = 0.029; OR_current = 1.71, p = 0.002). Increments in age were associated with increments in the probability of use (OR_previous = 1.42, p < 0.001; OR_current = 1.27, p < 0.001). Being single showed a very interesting result, as it had an an important impact on the probability of being a current user (OR_current = 6.48, p < 0.001), but not with being a previous user (OR_previous = 1.22, p < 0.177). To better understand the relevance of these variables, we computed the probability of belonging to each group for an 18-year-old heterosexual woman in a relationship and for a 26-year-old single non-heterosexual man (both with mean scores in all personality variables). For that woman, p_nonuser = 0.95, p_previous = 0.04, and p_current = 0.01; for that man, p_nonuser = 0.12, p_previous = 0.45, and p_current = 0.44. All of the personality scores showed statistically non-significant coefficients (ORs in the range [0.86, 1.19], ps ? 0.058), except for Open-Mindedness with current use (OR_previous = 1.22, p = 0.026).